என்ன difference between SARMs and steroids?
SARMs are advertised as safer, legal alternatives to anabolic androgenic steroids. They are said to provide similar positive results, but to have a lower risk of side effects.
What are SARMs? அனைத்து முதல், SARMs are not the same thing as anabolic steroids, even though they work on similar pathways in the body.
தேர்ந்தெடுக்கப்பட்ட ஆண்ட்ரோஜன் வாங்கி மாற்றிகள் refer to an entire class of therapeutic compounds that stimulate androgen receptors, வெறும் டெஸ்டோஸ்டிரோன் செய்கிறது என்றால்.
எனினும், அந்த androgenic properties of SARMs are not as pronounced as that of anabolic agents like testosterone.
The reduced androgenic properties permits SARMs to benefit from tissue selectivity, androgen-receptor specificity, and a lack of side effects related to steroid use.
மேலும், SARMs remain legal in the United States to purchase and possess without a prescription. மாறாக, steroids are illegal and are controlled substances with serious penalties for possession and use. ஆன்லைன் இங்கே சட்ட ஊக்க வாங்க.
அனபோலிக் ஸ்டெராய்டுகள், மறுபுறம், are synthetic versions of testosterone, which is a male sex hormone.
The proper name for anabolic steroids is anabolic-androgenic steroids (AAS).
கால “உட்சேர்க்கைக்குரிய” is a reference to the muscle-building effect.
These steroids can increase lean muscle mass because they cause the body to synthesize more protein and build more muscle tissue, given the right strength-training stimulus.
கால “ஆண்ட்ரோஜெனிக்” is a reference to the increased sex characteristics associated with males. சாறு, Gear, Stackers, and Roids are all common nicknames for steroids.
Health care providers may prescribe patients steroids in order to treat delayed puberty and other hormonal issues.
Topical tteroids and growth hormone are also able to treat the muscle loss related to certain diseases, such as AIDS and cancer.
எனினும், many bodybuilders and athletes opt to use these drugs in order to better their physical appearance or increase their performance.
What are SARMs supplements?
SARM stands for Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators.
They are synthetic compounds that retain some of the muscle building or anabolic properties of testosterone, but do not share other properties.
Instead of indiscriminately activating all different types of androgen receptors in the human body, they are selective for certain subtypes of receptors.
These compounds also stimulate anabolic activity, but they only work on receptors in muscle and bone.
What this means, அடிப்படையில், is that because SARMs are less androgenic than many of the steroids out there, they can distinguish and “select” between anabolic activity and androgenic effects.
They provide the properties of anabolic steroids to a limited degree, and they can help bodybuilders (and patients if for medical use) avoid a lot of the side effects that can come with steroid use.
A number of pharmaceutical companies are researching these drugs to replace medical use of anabolic steroids for muscle wasting disease, osteoporosis and some forms of dwarfism or anaemia.
Are SARMs as good as steroids? Most bodybuilders will tell you that they do not produce results as fast as taking illegal anabolic steroids. எனினும், given than they are safer in comparison, this is usually a worthwhile trade-off.
SARMs are sometimes sold in products called nutritional supplements.
These are similar to over-the-counter Testosterone booster products that you might find at your local GNC.
Note that the FDA has recently started removing dietary supplements that contain SARMs from the market. As these ingredients are synthetically manufactured and not natural chemicals, they do not qualify for inclusion in dietary supplements in the USA.
What are the different types of SARMS?
A list of the most common SARMs on the market would have to include:
The mechanism of action will vary depending on the compound. But no matter the type of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators, they all work by selecting, that is to say stimulating certain receptors and/or inhibiting others.
Some of these are more effective for increasing lean muscle mass while others are better for reducing body fat. Note that most of the research regarding the use of this products has been conducted in animals and not in double-blind placebo-controlled trials involving humans.
Bodybuilders often rely on anecdotal evidence and user testimonials to learn about the potential benefits of these compounds, but more research is needed to validate any claims.
Some of the main benefits of SARMs over steroids are as follows:
As of now, there are no SARMs intended for clinical use on the market. தற்போது, pharmaceutical companies are developing SARMs for markets in AIDS, oncology, general aging, and cardiovascular health.
The pharmaceutical companies are also keeping the bone market in mind when it comes to the development of SARMs for clinical use.
SARMs differ in their உட்சேர்க்கைக்குரிய விளைவு. Accordingly, there are some SARMs that are more anabolic than others.
பொதுவாக, bodybuilders and athletes want to use the most anabolic SARM on the market. This is because the most anabolic compounds are often the most effective at promoting gains in body mass.
Some of the most potent SARMs on the market include LDG-3303 and LDG-4033. உதாரணமாக, bodybuilders and athletes who take LGD-4033 can sometimes gain up to 15 pounds of lean muscle in just one cycle.
While SARMs do possess anabolic properties, these compounds are not considered anabolic steroids.
உண்மையில், the many advantages of SARMs are due to that fact that SARMs are not actually anabolic steroids.
Athletes and bodybuilders who take SARMs will be able to enjoy the advantages of the anabolic properties without suffering from side effects associated with the androgenic properties.
A common question that many athletes and bodybuilders have is “What is the advantage of SARMs over testosterone?“
The results of testosterone are more “proven” for yheir ability to increase muscle mass while not as much information is known about SARMs.
The main reason many prefer to take SARMs over testosterone is that SARMs can be taken orally. மறுபுறம், testosterone needs to be injected.
பல மக்கள், the act of injection is a far bigger step than taking something orally. Another reason many people prefer SARMs is the legality issues associated with obtaining and using anabolic-androgenic steroids.
It is much easier to use your credit or debit card to buy SARMs, which are considered domestic research chemicals.
Do SARMs increase testosterone? ஆம், they often can.
Many bodybuilders and athletes use SARMs to maintain body mass gains in between cycles. எனினும், there are some who choose a SARMs stack with steroids. One route that many people take is as follows:
While it is possible to stack SARMs with steroids, many prefer using a SARM stack and taking them as a bridge cycle. A bridge refers to the use of an anabolic agent that will not hinder natural production of testosterone.
Bridges will allow the user to not just preserve muscle growth but also to add to strength and lean mass gains after a completed steroid cycle.
A bridge will essentially tide the user over until the next steroid cycle. Bridges between steroid cycles are usually four to 12 நீண்ட வாரங்கள். நிச்சயமாக, the length of time of bridge usage depends on the goals of the user.
Different people have different opinions on bridges. Some people feel as if bridges are a waste while others believe bridges are an essential part of cycling properly.
Many bodybuilders must use a bridge because they rely on suppressive androgenic anabolic steroids to gain in body weight and muscle mass. These steroids leave these bodybuilders with limited டெஸ்டோஸ்டிரோன் இயற்கை தயாரிப்பு.
Some of the compounds that are used together with SARMs include:
SARMs may also be stacked with prohormones, supplements like fat burner, testosterone boosters like DAA, or with other bodybuilding supplements like creatine.
Following a cycle of anabolic steroid, endogenous testosterone levels can be decimated.
This is the result of stress on the Hypothalamic Pituitary Testicular Axis (பயங்கரவாத தடை சட்டத்தின்), which connects a number of endocrine glands to regulate the hormonal environment of the body.
The HPTA works through a negative feedback loop, increasing testosterone production when it detects a lack of androgens and shutting down production when it detects a surplus.
With steroid use, there is almost always a surplus of androgens. This means suppression or shutdown of natural testosterone production is almost guaranteed.
போஸ்ட் சைக்கிள் சிகிச்சை (PCT) incorporates drugs like SARMS, Aromatase Inhibitors and HCG to help kickstart testosterone production and restore proper HPTA function.
It is not recommended to cycle steroids without planning a PCT in advance.
The HPTA may recover on its own without any PCT intervention, but this process can take several months. The interconnected nature of HPTA functions and its negative feedback loop help clarify why bodybuilders strongly recommend a PCT after a steroid cycle.
When using anabolic drugs, there are numerous aspects that influence the level of difficulty a person may experience in trying to recover their normal HPTA function.
These aspects are:
Personal reaction: Every single person will respond differently to any chemical substance, compound, மருந்து, nutrient or food available.
Some people, உதாரணமாக, may not suffer any type of HPTA interference. Other people will experience extreme HPTA suppression to the extent that they may need lengthier periods of time to recover.
Anabolic drugs yield a wide range of individual responses. Some people are fortunate enough to recover fast with minimal effort, while on the opposite side of the spectrum certain individuals will struggle to recover throughout their PCT cycle.
In between the two opposites there is the the average/mild response. But again, this depends largely on the genetic predisposition of the person and how their HPTA will react as it tries to restore homeostasis.
Kinds of anabolic drugs taken: Each and every anabolic drug demonstrates a suppressive effect on the HPTA through its built-in negative feedback loop. There are no exclusions, even with anabolics that have a reputation for being mild.
However the degree of the suppressive effect can vary depending on the steroid that is being cycled. பொருட்படுத்தாமல், all anabolic drugs taken at common cycle durations of weeks at a time will result in HPTA suppression or shutdown.
Cycle duration (level of testicular desensitization): This is held by many physique builders to be the most important factor.
For the duration of anabolic steroid administration, most Leydig testicular cells will remain idle. The longer they stay inactive, the bigger the struggle will be in getting these cells to react to the triggering signals of LH and FSH hormones in the future.
It has been observed that the problem with recovery of the Leydig cells after anabolic steroid administration isn’t because of LH insufficiency. The problem is that Leydig cells become desensitized to LH.
In a particular study published in 1975 gave external testosterone to male users for a cycle of 21 வாரங்கள். LH levels were decreased right after the onset of the usage cycle.
எனினும், towards the end of the 21 வாரம் சுழற்சி, LH amounts were seen to spike within a matter of 3 weeks following the stop of external Testosterone administration. இந்த போதிலும், Testosterone amounts didn’t spike until several weeks later in the majority of the study subjects.
Both SARMs and steroids have negative side effects. While a few of these side effects are serious, the vast majority of the side effects are fairly benign.
We can’t cover all side effects for all steroids, எனினும், some of the side effects of steroids include:
அவற்றில் சில side effects of the use of SARMs சேர்க்கிறது:
பொதுவாக, it is believed that SARMs are safer than anabolic androgenic steroids and that you would need to use these drugs for longer periods of time or at higher dosages to experience harmful side effects.
எனினும், since there have been limited research studies on most of these agents and no large-scale double-blind placebo-controlled studies, there is insufficient evidence to rate safety.
What is known is that SARMS only stimulate androgen receptors in muscle tissue and bone. அதன் விளைவாக, using these drugs can avoid many of the harmful effects that are associated with activating androgen receptors in other tissue.
மேலும், there is less decrease in HPTA activity and less of a requirement for testosterone-boosting supplements or drugs in a post-cycle therapy.
SARMs also do not cause elevations in liver enzymes and do not pose a risk of hepatotoxicity or liver damage. This makes them distinct from oral steroids and prohormones, which do put added strain on liver function.
SARM S-23 is an oral synthetic compound developed by GTx that originally showed promise because it exhibited exceptionally high binding affinity for androgen receptors.
Greater affinity for binding to these receptors means greater anabolic activity, such as improved muscle mass and fat loss. While this SARM is considered more potent than Ostabolic (mk-2866) or Andarine (S-4), it should not be used due to serious side effects.
Researchers found that use of SARM S-23 could result in a decrease in prostate size, and LH (லியூடினைசிங் ஹார்மோன்) and FSH (Follicle-Stimulating Hormone) நிலைகள். In one rat study, it also resulted in infertility and an inability to produce sperm for males.
Use of SARM S-23 significantly suppressed natural testosterone production and worked as a male contraceptive.
While this effect was reversed in the rat studies after 100 days from the final dosage, there have not been any human research studies to determine what effects this would have for male bodybuilders.
Ostarine is a well-known product that Dylan Gemelli talks about for supporting bodybuilders in achieving their objectives.
Is Ostarine a steroid?
We think you know the answer, ஆனால் எந்த, it’s a SARM.
Ostarine is a SARM that is commonly regarded as the best for bodybuilding. This compound is a nonsteroidal and orally active supplement.
A phase II clinical trial involving 120 healthy men and women revealed that Ostarine was able to increase lean body mass significantly. The compound also improved insulin sensitivity and improved physical function.
Bodybuilders often take Ostarine during recomposition and bulking phases. Some users gain seven pounds of lean body mass or more in just two months during bulking phases by using Ostarine. Other users report a decrease in fat mass.
Ostarine (also called Ostabolic and Enobosarm), does not belong in the category of anabolic drugs–it is a part of the newest category of trial performance support drugs which are called Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators)/SARMS.
SARMS are a new addition to the world of performance drugs and support products. Just like the rest of its kind, it is currently under trial and isn’t yet officially produced and sold as a real drug. The drug is currently the subject of medical testing.
The drug was initially introduced by Merck and Company which was later seized by company GTX Inc. It’s original medicinal purpose was to control muscle loss issues and osteoporosis, and this is where the medical studies are currently oriented.
The drug is also under research for the perspective of protecting and controlling the onset of other problems like sarcopenia, cachexia or TRT therapy.
Similarly to other SARM drugs, Ostarine merges with and triggers the function of androgen receptors in the system collectively in a manner that assists with muscle support, muscle loss prevention, and strength support.
It works selectively in certain areas while ignoring others like for example skin, உச்சந்தலையில், or prostate tissues which show often unpleasant side effects.
This fact drew the attention of the bodybuilding and sports body in such a high level that the Anti-Doping agency carried out tests to test and detect it in Jan 2008.
Ostarine is reportedly the top anabolic of its kind on offer.
Just like the rest of its kind (SARMs), Ostarine doesn’t look similar to the typical chemical makeup of anabolic drugs such as trenbolone acetate. Its exact chemical profile hasn’t been shared in public by its company.
இன்னும், its general chemical ingredients can be viewed at patent databases like WIPO and in several study references.
One thing we should note is that Ostarine is often confused with the chemical makeup of a S-4 or Andrarine. Ostarine is also known by its chemical name Aryl Propionamide.
The main difference between Ostarine and Andarine is that the first bears cyano replacements instead of nitro & acetamido moieties.
Research has shown that Ostarine when used in higher amounts than the ones suggested, can downgrade the endogenous generation of Testosterone in men.
A similar side effect also appears if someone takes Ostarine for more than 5 வாரங்கள். இந்த காரணத்திற்காக, it is considered an HPTA-suppressive substance and requires some kind of Post Cycle Therapy protocol.
Due to the fact that this is not an anabolic drug, it doesn’t come with the typical negative side effects of anabolic drugs–besides the negative side effects already stated above.
For this reason it does not show any estrogen, androgen producing, liver-toxic or heart/circulation side effects.
எனினும், as the drug is novice and is currently under research it is highly probable that future research may show new side effects that we aren’t currently aware of.
SARMs bodybuilding supplements are often considered “research chemicals.” எனவே, these compounds are not considered entirely illegal. Most SARMs are not scheduled drugs or prescription drugs.
எனினும், it is a violation of the DSHEA law of the FDA to sell SARMs as supplements or to sell them in supplement stores. The use of SARMs has also been banned in many sports.
சட்ட ரீதியான தகுதி is one of the major differences between SARMs versus steroids. Be careful if you decide to take either of these substances.DesoxymethyltestosteroneHexadroneMadol SteroidMetanabolMk677Nano-1 TestosteroneNutrobalFerapleksProhormones vs. ஸ்ட்டீராய்டுகள்SARMs vs. ஸ்ட்டீராய்டுகள்சூப்பர் AnadrolSuperdrolTrenabolTrenadrolTrenavarTrenbolone Tren X ProhormoneTrendione